Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor consideration of future consequences scale-14 (Pre-published version)
Citation
McKay, M.T., Perry, J.L., Percy, A., Cole, J.C. (2016) 'Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor consideration of future consequences scale-14.' 98(1), pp. 133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097.
View/ Open
Date
2016Author
Perry, John
McKay, Michael T.
Percy, Andrew
Cole, Jon C.
Peer Reviewed
YesMetadata
Show full item record
McKay, M.T., Perry, J.L., Percy, A., Cole, J.C. (2016) 'Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor consideration of future consequences scale-14.' 98(1), pp. 133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097.
Abstract
Researchers have proposed 1-factor, 2-factor, and bifactor solutions to the 12-item Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFCS-12). In order to overcome some measurement problems and to create a robust and conceptually useful two-factor scale the CFCS-12 was recently modified to include two new items and to become the CFCS-14. Using a University sample, we tested four competing models for the CFCS-14: (a) a 12-item unidimensional model, (b) a model fitted for two uncorrelated factors (CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future), (c) a model fitted for two correlated factors (CFC-I and CFC-F), and (d) a bifactor model. Results suggested that the addition of the two new items has strengthened the viability of a two factor solution of the CFCS-14. Results of linear regression models suggest that the CFC-F factor is redundant. Further studies using alcohol and mental health indicators are required to test this redundancy.
Keywords
Consideration of future consequences scaleExploratory structural equation modeling
Bifactor solution