The use of a distal-to-tactile sensory substitution interface does not lead to extension of body image
Citation
McGann, M. et al (2011) 'The use of a distal-to-tactile sensory substitution interface does not lead to extension of body image'. BIO Web of Conferences 1(00060), 4p. DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20110100060.
View/ Open
Date
2011Author
McGann, Marek
Froese, Tom
Bigge, William
Spiers, Adam
Seth, Anil K.
Peer Reviewed
YesMetadata
Show full item record
McGann, M. et al (2011) 'The use of a distal-to-tactile sensory substitution interface does not lead to extension of body image'. BIO Web of Conferences 1(00060), 4p. DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20110100060.
Abstract
A range of studies in the past decade and a half indicate significant impacts of tool use on body image. In cases of intentional action, contractions of near space or experienced extensions of limbs have been shown when using tools such as rakes. It remains unclear whether the changes in body image are effected by the tool enabling perception at a distance or action/manipulation of the environment at a distance. We studied this issue using a new research tool, the Enactive Torch, a sensory substitution device specifically designed for research into perception and bodily action. The Enactive Torch allows perception at a distance without the capacity for distal action. We report a first experiment indicating that its use on a navigation task has no effect on body image.
Keywords
Distal-to-TactileSensory substitution interface
Extension
Body Image